Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than terracotta· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than terracotta· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Other rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Other rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (no swatch colour on one side), so no score is shown.
Colour not compared · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than terracotta · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (no swatch colour on one side), so no score is shown.
Colour not compared · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: rosy bronze blow / tan contour
e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand in You Go Cocoa, against Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Coco-Loco. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCoco-LocoClosest matchYou Go CocoaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%84#581e0e#652216Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Overall match 80/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
