Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Stila Convertible Color Lip & Cheek Cream Blush in Lillium, against Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Cotton Candy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCotton CandyClosest shade matchLilliumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#f08c7c#ef8679Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall74
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 50.5 Rosy Peach, against Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Cotton Candy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCotton CandyClosest overall alternative50.5 Rosy PeachHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#f08c7c#f39384Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.