Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than mauve· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than mauve · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: electric pink / violet fuschia
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Berry rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 40% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Berry rather than mauve · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Bright Hot Pink Fuschia Berry Trio
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Teased, against Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Ube Berry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUbe BerryClosest shade matchTeasedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour55%78#bb578d#cd4994Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 74/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Spirited, against Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Ube Berry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUbe BerryClosest overall alternativeSpiritedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour55%75#bb578d#b3658aClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
