Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid
Differences: Apricot rather than coral· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than coral · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Red rather than coral· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Red rather than coral · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Red rather than coral· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than coral · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Pulse, against Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Sunset Lychee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunset LycheeClosest shade matchPulseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%97#e25d53#e25b4fLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall55
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Coral Crush, against Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Sunset Lychee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSunset LycheeClosest overall alternativeCoral CrushHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#e25d53#ea5d4cVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Overall match 96/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.