I Am My Skin Hydra-Tint Foundation Stick 8 Abidjan dupes and alternatives Juvia's Place
4.5 (18)·Deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
43
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: rich tan with rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
43
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: rich tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
43
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: deepest skin w/ neutral to golden undertones
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Juvia's Place I Am My Skin Hydra-Tint Foundation Stick 8 Abidjan (Deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Too Faced Born This Way Soft Matte Foundation in Mocha, against Juvia's Place I Am My Skin Hydra-Tint Foundation Stick in 8 Abidjan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8 AbidjanClosest shade matchMochaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#97522c#995130Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionRich deepRich deepBoth described as rich deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared63
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Combination, normalNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for combination/normal skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L'Oréal Paris Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation in 520 Sienna, against Juvia's Place I Am My Skin Hydra-Tint Foundation Stick in 8 Abidjan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8 AbidjanClosest overall alternative520 SiennaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%98#97522c#99512bLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.