Good Apple Skin-Perfecting Hydrating Foundation Balm Deep 096 dupes and alternatives KVD Beauty
3.8 (5,078)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural matte rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural matte rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Very Deep with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.50 less (62%)4.3 (2,230)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with golden neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
$18.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$24.01 less (56%)4.3 (1,381)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.51 less (62%)4.1 (9,493)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
The closest shade to KVD Beauty Good Apple Skin-Perfecting Hydrating Foundation Balm Deep 096 (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
TIRTIR Mask Fit Red Cushion in 47N EBONY, against KVD Beauty Good Apple Skin-Perfecting Hydrating Foundation Balm in Deep 096. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 096Closest match47N EBONYHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#61462e#664630Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.