Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than nude· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than nude· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (54%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· White rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · White rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than nude· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than nude · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (46%)4.4 (1,922)
Shimmer
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Blanc Type, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 06 Nude Dusk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade06 Nude DuskClosest shade matchBlanc TypeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#f5e2db#fae4d8Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall38
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Overall match 74/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Pink Quartz, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 06 Nude Dusk. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade06 Nude DuskClosest overall alternativePink QuartzHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#f5e2db#f5e2d4Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.