Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver and copper pearls
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Top Off, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 10 Celestial Spark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10 Celestial SparkClosest shade matchTop OffHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#f6dacf#f2dbd0Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall62
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall88
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 82/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow in Field of Fairies, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 10 Celestial Spark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10 Celestial SparkClosest overall alternativeField of FairiesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%85#f6dacf#f2d1c9Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 92/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
