Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· White rather than silver· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than silver · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (46%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Cream rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than silver· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than silver · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: holographic blue with pink pearl
Differences: Purple rather than silver· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than silver · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Juvia's Place CULTURE Duochrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Fula, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 08 Cosmic Frost. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade08 Cosmic FrostClosest shade matchFulaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%81#c0bec9#c7c9d2Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightLightSameDepth difference 5.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared71
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 75/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Certified Platinum, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 08 Cosmic Frost. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade08 Cosmic FrostClosest overall alternativeCertified PlatinumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%69#c0bec9#d2cdd1Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%78LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall86
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$13 less (50%)
Sephora
