Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sparkling rose gold with a duo-chrome bluish-green shift
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (35%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Peach Sprinkle, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 09 Stellar Light. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade09 Stellar LightClosest matchPeach SprinkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#f4bfbb#efb9b5Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$13 less (50%)
