Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: metallic copper brown with silver reflects
Differences: Copper rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Burnish, against Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 11 Sparkling Comet. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 Sparkling CometClosest matchBurnishHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#ae7361#b57865Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing11-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 11-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$18 less (69%)
