Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 220 Buff C dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.6 (10,553)·Light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light-medium skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair-light skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light skin tones with pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with warm yellow undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (59%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
20
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin
The closest shade to Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 220 Buff C (Light · Warm undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Nougat 2.5 Golden, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 220 Buff C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade220 Buff CClosest shade matchNougat 2.5 GoldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#ebc39c#eac69fLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightFairCloseDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Dry, combination, sensitiveNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer in NC11.5, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 220 Buff C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade220 Buff CClosest overall alternativeNC11.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#ebc39c#f1ca9fVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightFairCloseDepth difference: 3.4
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 85/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
