Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 410 Bisque W dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.6 (10,553)·Medium light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with warm, golden undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (50%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 56% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 410 Bisque W (Medium light · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 23.5 Medium Amber, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 410 Bisque W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 Bisque WClosest shade match23.5 Medium AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d4a577#d6a476Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Medium Neutral, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 410 Bisque W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 Bisque WClosest overall alternativeMedium NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#d4a577#d6a071Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared74
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Dry, combination, sensitiveOily, combination, normalBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
