Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 560 Suede C dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.6 (10,553)·Deep tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle red undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with cool subtle red undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle brown undertones
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral olive undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Both claim 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep tan with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D2 - deep with warm undertones
The closest shade to Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 560 Suede C (Deep tan · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Instant Retouch Longwear Liquid Concealer in 450, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 560 Suede C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade560 Suede CClosest match450How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%99#926549#936649Looks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
