Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 420 Bisque N dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.6 (10,553)·Light · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (59%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: M1 - medium with neutral undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (59%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with subtle olive undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
56
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L2.5 - Light with cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light medium, yours as medium tan· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
56
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light medium, yours as medium tan · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L2.6 - Light to medium with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as fair, yours as medium tan· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as fair, yours as medium tan · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Fair with netural warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium tan
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium tan· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium tan · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Fair with neutral warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as very fair, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as very fair, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair with rosy undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as very fair, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as very fair, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair with rosy undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as very fair, yours as medium tan· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as very fair, yours as medium tan · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with cool, pink undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium tan
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium tan
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm, golden undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium tan
The closest shade to Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 420 Bisque N (Light · Warm · peach undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Medium Beige, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 420 Bisque N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade420 Bisque NClosest matchMedium BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#e0c5ab#dbbea0Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference: 3.4
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared74
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Dry, combination, sensitiveOily, combination, normalBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
