Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 530 Suede C dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.6 (10,553)·Medium · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin w/ very warm undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep-tan skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (75%)4.2 (5,664)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep w/ rich golden undertone - online only
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (6%)4.2 (7,617)
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (59%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
20
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as tan, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as tan, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Tan with neutral warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as tan, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as tan, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Tan with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Tan with neutral warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as light medium, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as light medium, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: light to medium with warm red undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as medium tan, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with golden peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as medium, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as medium, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral golden undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Described as medium, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Described as medium, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium beige with golden undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
The closest shade to Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer 530 Suede C (Medium · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible Full Wear Waterproof Concealer in 410 Almond, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 530 Suede C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade530 Suede CClosest match410 AlmondHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%92#cb915a#d29662Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 3.0
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, combination, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$16.01 less (50%)
Sephora
View at Target
