Colour Riche Original Satin Lipstick Peony Pink dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.3 (43,095)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Glossy rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Glossy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: pink beige with a white pearl
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Sheer tint rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Sheer tint rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$0.49 less (4%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: dusty rose with slight shimmer
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
4
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
26
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: a cool, mauve, rose pink for an irresistibly kissable pout
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Sheer tint rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Charlotte Tilbury K.I.S.S.I.N.G Satin Shine Lipstick in 90's Pink, against L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Original Satin Lipstick in Peony Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeony PinkClosest shade match90's PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%92#ad4e66#b15468Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared26
Finish55%26ShimmerSatinDifferentSatin finish rather than shimmer
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Not listed6-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 73/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Vintage Wine 326, against L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Original Satin Lipstick in Peony Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeony PinkClosest overall alternativeVintage Wine 326How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall82
Colour60%88#ad4e66#af4d6eVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%15WarmCoolDifferentCool against warm
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.