Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Fair 30 N dupes and alternatives m.ph by Mary Phillips
4.2 (630)·Medium light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very fair, cool-neutral undertones
The closest shade to m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Fair 30 N (Medium light · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 1N, against m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Fair 30 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 30 NClosest shade match1NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d1aa8c#d0ab90Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Natural Finish Foundation in .5 N, against m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Fair 30 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 30 NClosest overall alternative.5 NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#d1aa8c#cea488Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$21 less (43%)
Target
