Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Medium 130 O dupes and alternatives m.ph by Mary Phillips
4.2 (630)·Medium · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium deep, neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium deep, neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: medium with yellow undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with neutral beige undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (49%)4.3 (340)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm undertone
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with golden undertones
The closest shade to m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Medium 130 O (Medium · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation in 6, against m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Medium 130 O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium 130 OClosest shade match6How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#bf9565#c19462Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared75
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA True Skin Serum Foundation in Cres SF8.75, against m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Medium 130 O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium 130 OClosest overall alternativeCres SF8.75How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#bf9565#be8f62Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 91/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.