Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Tan 230 N dupes and alternatives m.ph by Mary Phillips
4.2 (630)·Deep tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (14%)3.4 (2,267)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (14%)3.4 (2,267)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: tan-deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: MD5.25 - Medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones, and an olive tone
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (51%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, peach undertones
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$29 less (59%)4.5 (18)
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
67
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: warm, golden brown that pops on undertones with sunlit depth
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation Tan 230 N (Deep tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Make Up For Ever Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation in 362WO Ochre, against m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Tan 230 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan 230 NClosest match362WO OchreHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%98#9c621d#9e621fLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraSame price
Ulta Beauty
