Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow Beaming Brighter dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,960)·Golden · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim comfort
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: liquid
Differences: Copper rather than golden· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (50%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Copper rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: metallic copper brown with silver reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Satin rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
65
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Bronze Brocade, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Beaming Brighter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeaming BrighterClosest shade matchBronze BrocadeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#a46a53#9c6451Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Muse, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Beaming Brighter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeaming BrighterClosest overall alternativeMuseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%81#a46a53#a8745dClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.5 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $6 more
