Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow Champagne Trail dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,960)·Taupe · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Silver rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (68%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Marble, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Champagne Trail. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChampagne TrailClosest matchMarbleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#a17661#a47662Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared66
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$3 less (11%)
