Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow Flash or Dash dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,960)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: golden bronze with gold and copper sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (36%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than golden· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sunset bronze metallic with gold glimmer/
antique bronze foil with champagne sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: burnt Bronze metallic with golden sands glimmer/
holographic rustic metal foil with shifts of pink & gold sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (36%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Terracotta rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Terracotta rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: maple sparkle, sunset sparkle
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
8
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Morphe ChromaPlus 6-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Outer Spice, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Flash or Dash. Matched on pan 5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlash or DashClosest shade matchOuter SpiceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#c8986c#cc9468Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared8
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPaletteDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 61/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Golden Light, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Flash or Dash. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlash or DashClosest overall alternativeGolden LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%79#c8986c#bf8c63Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightMediumCloseDepth difference 5.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%73NormalNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $2 more
