Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow Telepathic Teal dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,960)·Green · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.7 (163)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sparkling sea green with gold reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm green metallic with gold microglitter
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (57%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: olive green pearl with subtle gold undertones
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (50%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Dark olive metallic with taupe shimmer/Sage green foil with champagne sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than green· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
15
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sage green with silver pearls
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (46%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.8 (590)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
22
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm olive‑gold metallic shade with sparkling gold flecks & a shimmer finish
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
17
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than green · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (68%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than green
Score details
Shade match
12
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than green· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
14
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than green · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than green· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (39%)4.2 (339)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
CoverGirl TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette in That's Rad, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Telepathic Teal. Matched on pan 6. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTelepathic TealClosest matchThat's RadHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%76#1d705e#01675cClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 5.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared8
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 61/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.