Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow Crumbled Diamonds dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,960)·Blue · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Silver rather than blue· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than blue · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Taupe rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy taupe with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: White rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool-toned lavender with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rose quartz with a lavender shift
Differences: Silver rather than blue· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than blue · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than blue· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than blue · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than blue· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than blue · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sheer silvery baby pink with silver and pink sparkle
Differences: Lighter· White rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than blue · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sparkling rose gold with a duo-chrome bluish-green shift
Differences: Nude rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Silver rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Silver rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Silver rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 15-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (50%)4.4 (1,922)
Glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than blue· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than blue · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 40% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (46%)4.0 (271)
Glitter · Opaque
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than blue· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne with icy blue sparkle
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Silver rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · White rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow in Big Ego, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Crumbled Diamonds. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrumbled DiamondsClosest matchBig EgoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%79#cfc0bf#c7b9b2Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormalNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$21 less (75%)
Sephora
