Frost Eyeshadow In Living Pink dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Copper rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Copper rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
NYX Professional Makeup Lid Lingerie Cream Eye Pigment in Risky Rosé, against MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in In Living Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIn Living PinkClosest shade matchRisky RoséHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%83#ed918f#e88482Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightMediumCloseDepth difference 5.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared28
Longevity50%208-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 76/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Rose Gold, against MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in In Living Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIn Living PinkClosest overall alternativeRose GoldHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%75#ed918f#d98982Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%84LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 82/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $6 more
