Frost Eyeshadow Tutu Good dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (54%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims comfort
Differences: Copper rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Copper rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Copper rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (77%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: golden coral with a hint of peach
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Copper rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Copper rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than pink· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than pink · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: medium terracotta brown matte
RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Crystal Slipper, against MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in Tutu Good. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTutu GoodClosest matchCrystal SlipperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%87#ea8862#e0896bVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 75/100Shade match 77/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.