Frost Eyeshadow That's Showbiz Baby dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Black · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than black
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than black · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (31%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than black · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (42%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than black· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than black · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than black · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: metallic gunmetal grey with sparkling reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
28
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than black· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
20
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than black · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than black
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
21
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than black · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than black
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than black · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than black
Score details
Shade match
15
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than black · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than black
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than black · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than black· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
21
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than black
Score details
Shade match
22
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than black · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than black
Score details
Shade match
18
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than black · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sparkling sea green with gold reflects
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than black
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Try Me On, against MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in That's Showbiz Baby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeThat's Showbiz BabyClosest shade matchTry Me OnHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall61
Colour60%78#738975#7a8d81Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 70/100Shade match 61/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.