Frost Eyeshadow Satin Taupe dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: brown pearl with subtle pink undertones
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (77%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: smokey chocolate brown shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than taupe· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than taupe · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than taupe· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than taupe · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Bright Eyes, against MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in Satin Taupe. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSatin TaupeClosest matchBright EyesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%73#957779#a47f7cClose colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87MediumMediumSameDepth difference 5.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall63
Longevity50%858-hour wear11-hour wearClose11-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 80/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautySame price
Sephora
