Frost Eyeshadow Nude Model dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Plum · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: bright rose‑gold shade with soft-pink & a shimmer finish
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.50 less (60%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.50 less (60%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Copper rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Spark, against MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in Nude Model. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude ModelClosest shade matchSparkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%88#c67971#c27167Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%15WarmCoolDifferentCool against warm
Colour family15%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall72
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 77/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Glamourust, against MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in Nude Model. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude ModelClosest overall alternativeGlamourustHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%94#c67971#c87c70Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 78/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.