Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color Cool Spice dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,105)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: soft rosy-pink shade with a matte finish
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: liquid
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Copper rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Copper rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (20%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Red rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Copper rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
26
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
4
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Fizzy Fig, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Cool Spice. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCool SpiceClosest shade matchFizzy FigHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%73#c06d57#ba7969Close colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall42
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Overall match 72/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in BRB, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Cool Spice. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCool SpiceClosest overall alternativeBRBHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%60#c06d57#ca7e71Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%78Deep / darkMediumSome differenceDepth difference 7.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 83/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.