Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color Tete-A-Tint dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,105)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (32%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$13.01 less (52%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Crystal Slipper, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Tete-A-Tint. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTete-A-TintClosest shade matchCrystal SlipperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#d5876e#e0896bVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall35
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 71/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 22M Cashew, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Tete-A-Tint. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTete-A-TintClosest overall alternative22M CashewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%65#d5876e#cb957eSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightMediumCloseDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Overall match 83/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $7 more
