Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color Omega dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,105)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than taupe · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than taupe · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: true tan with neutral undertones
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (28%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
9
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: warm brown with silver sparkle
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in So Metal, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Omega. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOmegaClosest shade matchSo MetalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%72#b69370#af9680Close colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall9
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 56/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 30M Cedar, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Omega. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOmegaClosest overall alternative30M CedarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%59#b69370#c2957dSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Overall match 81/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
