Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color Tailor Grey dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,105)·Taupe · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
34
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Tease, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Tailor Grey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTailor GreyClosest shade matchTeaseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#9f7c6d#9f8075Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Overall match 84/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Cobblestone, against MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Tailor Grey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTailor GreyClosest overall alternativeCobblestoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%74#9f7c6d#9c847aClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.