Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick Mandarin O dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (677)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: buildable
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.8 (1,631)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Glossy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glossy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Sheer tint rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Sheer tint rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 10-hour wear· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Dior Addict Glass Lipstick in 334: Dior Blossom, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Mandarin O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMandarin OClosest shade match334: Dior BlossomHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall97
Colour60%96#e8363c#ee313eLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%4010-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 78/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Polished Peach, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Mandarin O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMandarin OClosest overall alternativePolished PeachHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%89#e8363c#ec3f47Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%7010-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 10-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$3 less (11%)
