Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick Teddy 2.0 dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (677)·Nude · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: pinky brown with a matte finish
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$13Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (52%)4.2 (9,047)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· 24-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
33
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Dior Rouge Dior On Stage in 120 Iconic Rose, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Teddy 2.0. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTeddy 2.0Closest shade match120 Iconic RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%94#c97068#c76e6aVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7010-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 10-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Super Stay Teddy Tint Long Lasting Matte Lip Tint in Skinnydip, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Teddy 2.0. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTeddy 2.0Closest overall alternativeSkinnydipHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#c97068#d16d63Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%9010-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 93/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.