Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer 115 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (11,365)·Light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm peach undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer 115 (Light · Warm undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 2W, against Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer in 115. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade115Closest shade match2WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#e9c1a4#ebbf9fLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionLightLight mediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared51
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%—not comparableNot listedFullNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, dry, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 72/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Fair Warm, against Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer in 115. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade115Closest overall alternativeFair WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#e9c1a4#efc3a2Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightFairCloseDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionLightFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 4 compared78
Finish35%78RadiantSatinCloseSatin finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%—not comparableNot listedFullNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared59
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveDry, combination, normalMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.