Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (46%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very fair skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for very fair skin with olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Very light with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$13.01 less (50%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer Shade: 1.5 Eins.5 (Fair · Warm · yellow undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Fair 140 W, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 1.5 Eins.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade: 1.5 Eins.5Closest matchFair 140 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#edcf99#f4d39eVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96FairVery fairCloseDepth difference: 2.4
Retailer descriptionVery fairFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $8 more
