Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer Shade: 6 - Sechs dupes and alternatives Monika Blunder Beauty
4.2 (11)·Medium tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (8%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with golden olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$7.01 less (27%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer Shade: 6 - Sechs (Medium tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Bobbi Brown Weightless Skin Oil-Controlling Foundation SPF 15 in Neutral Golden (N-070), against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 6 - Sechs. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade: 6 - SechsClosest shade matchNeutral Golden (N-070)How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#cd7c38#c47d3fVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared43
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
LYS Beauty Triple Fix Blurring and Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation Stick in DN3, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 6 - Sechs. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade: 6 - SechsClosest overall alternativeDN3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#cd7c38#c17b47Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Medium tanTanCloseDepth difference: 2.3
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedDry, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (8%)
Target
