Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer Shade: 8 - ACHT dupes and alternatives Monika Blunder Beauty
4.2 (11)·Very deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$10.01 less (39%)4.5 (1,466)
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: dark deep with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Adds SPF 27
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep with cool red undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer Shade: 8 - ACHT (Very deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Estée Lauder Futurist Skin Tint Serum Foundation SPF 20 in 6C1 Rich Cocoa, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 8 - ACHT. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared65
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%40FullLightDifferentLight coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared66
Longevity30%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Deep 290 C, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 8 - ACHT. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared75
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.