Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: D2.5 - deep with cool undertone
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish· Adds SPF 45
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool, subtle red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: extra deep with cool rich-red undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with cool rose undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep skin with cool/rich red undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral brown undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim
Retailer shade note: for deep neutral skin with a peach hue
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep cool skin with a red hue
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Very deep with cool undertones
The closest shade to Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer Shade: 6.5 SECHS.5 (Deep tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
NARS Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in LA SERENA, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 6.5 SECHS.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade: 6.5 SECHS.5Closest shade matchLA SERENAHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%94#b16348#b16546Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NW48, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 6.5 SECHS.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade: 6.5 SECHS.5Closest overall alternativeNW48How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#b16348#aa6848Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared75
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $16 more
