Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: dark shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: dark with a neutral undertone
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral, subtle golden undertones
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (19%)4.4 (38)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (54%)5.0 (1)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (33%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: tan to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral subtle golden undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$40.01 less (77%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$40.01 less (77%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer Shade: 6.25 SECHS.25 (Tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Fluid SPF 15 Foundation in C8, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 6.25 SECHS.25. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade: 6.25 SECHS.25Closest shade matchC8How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#bd7048#be703dVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared50
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall70
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Chanel N°1 DE CHANEL Revitalizing Foundation in B140, against Monika Blunder Beauty Blunder Cover Foundation/Concealer in Shade: 6.25 SECHS.25. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShade: 6.25 SECHS.25Closest overall alternativeB140How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%94#bd7048#b87046Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$36 less (69%)
Walmart
