Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: electric pink glow / medium-tan contour
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
ColourPop Hydrating Blush Stix in Digicam, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P36 Wisteria Lilac. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP36 Wisteria LilacClosest matchDigicamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%92#e49ad9#ec95daVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall85
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $2 more
