Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than berry· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Gel rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than berry · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Gel rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Bobbi Brown Pot Rouge Cream Blush for Lips & Cheeks in Velvet Plum, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P79 Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP79 MauveClosest shade matchVelvet PlumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%81#933849#8a3f45Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall91
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 500R - Plum It Up, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P79 Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP79 MauveClosest overall alternative500R - Plum It UpHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour55%78#933849#9b454fClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 5.6 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 86/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$4 less (10%)
