Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Morphe Cheek Thrills Multi-Finish Face Trio in Blind Date, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P72 Dahlia. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP72 DahliaClosest shade matchBlind DateHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%96#d87678#dd7376Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Amour – 901, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P72 Dahlia. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP72 DahliaClosest overall alternativeAmour – 901How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%93#d87678#cf7374Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$8 less (19%)
