Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Matte Bouncy Blush in Hope, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P71 Bow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP71 BowClosest shade matchHopeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#cb726a#d26d6aVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 110A - Into The Nude, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P71 Bow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP71 BowClosest overall alternative110A - Into The NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#cb726a#c4796fVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Overall match 94/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$2 less (5%)
