Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim hydration
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (74%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
MERIT Flush Balm Cream Blush in Le BonBon, against Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P75 Tulip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP75 TulipClosest matchLe BonBonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%97#dd647b#db6077Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$2 less (5%)
Ulta Beauty
