Skin Silk Serum Foundation F12.7NC dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.9 (223)·Medium tan · Olive · cool olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: tan skin w/neutral or pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Cool rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Cool rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium-deep skin with neutral/deep peachy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium-deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Red Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Red Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: very intense dark-medium shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium-deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
24
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
21
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with soft rosy undertones
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation F12.7NC (Medium tan · Olive · cool olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Ulta Beauty Collection Moisturizing Complexion Stick in Medium Cool, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F12.7NC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF12.7NCClosest shade matchMedium CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%97#c38969#c28b6aLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 77/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Backstage Glow-Up Skin Tint Hydrating Tinted Moisturizer SPF 20 in 6N, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F12.7NC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF12.7NCClosest overall alternative6NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%88#c38969#c7845dVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.