Skin Silk Serum Foundation F14.2NW dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.9 (223)·Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: dark shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: dark warm skin with golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with warm bronze undertones
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$2.41 less (16%)4.2 (8,852)
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation F14.2NW (Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 345, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F14.2NW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF14.2NWClosest shade match345How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#a26f41#a56e3aVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 76/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Superdewy Cushion Foundation in Medium Tan Neutral, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F14.2NW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF14.2NWClosest overall alternativeMedium Tan NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%87#a26f41#ab6d3aVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $3.49 more
Target
