Skin Silk Serum Foundation F16 dupes and alternatives Revolution Beauty
3.9 (223)·Deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with cool rose undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with red golden undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation F16 (Deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Maracuja Juicy Glow Tint in 53N Deep Neutral, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F16. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF16Closest shade match53N Deep NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#845440#84513cLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in Deep Neutral, against Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F16. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeF16Closest overall alternativeDeep NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%85#845440#7e5748Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 88/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Walmart
SephoraCosts $9 more
